<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>NTS Talk - new forum threads</title>
		<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/start</link>
		<description>Threads in forums of the site &quot;NTS Talk&quot; - Revitalizing the National Traffic System</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-15540355</guid>
				<title>QRZ?</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-15540355/qrz</link>
				<description>Checking for a pulse</description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 22:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Phil Temples K9HI</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>8441311</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Is anyone still active on NTS Talk?</p> <p>73,<br /> Phil, K9HI</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-619831</guid>
				<title>Retiring NTS stalwart</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-619831/retiring-nts-stalwart</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Glenn Killam</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Folks: I learned today that Roy &quot;Hoppie&quot; Hopkins W3TWV of Clarks Summit PA is retiring from NTS. Hoppie is 87 years old and has decided to slow down somewhat from his previous undertakings. Hoppie has been a mainstay on NTS circuits in Cycle 2 for a great many years and I doubt there are very many of you who have not had at least one message from him with either ARL Sixty Seven - No Outlet or ARL Forty Seven in the text.<br /> Hoppie picked up his last message today, ironically from me destined for KB3BAA and then informed the net that he would be relinquishing the reins. Hoppie was also a regular on the 3RN.<br /> My suggestion is for each and everyone of us to either draft an NTS message and/or send a card to this gentleman. He has been a tremendous asset to NTS for a long time and will be sorely missed. His unique voice on SSB was instantly recognizable.<br /> As an aside, when I passed the message to him today, it was obvious to me that he was very emotional. he required 3 repeats of the text of an 8-word message, which normally would be gotten on the first try. It goes without saying that it is difficult to write when your glasses are fogged up.<br /> Talk it up among your friends and acquaintances as well, and let the entire amateur NTS community tell Mr Hopkins how valuable he has been to the system.<br /> 73,<br /> Glenn</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-550530</guid>
				<title>eHam.net Article</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-550530/eham-net-article</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 06:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>KD8RBP</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1396259</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I submitted the same &quot;Radiogram QSO&quot; proposal on this site as an article on eHam.net about a month ago before I started to develop the Radiogram CQ website. I just got an e-mail yesterday on Friday (8/10/2012) saying that the article was approved and is now on the front page of the eHam.net website. I sent an e-mail to the articles manager to see if they could add an editor's note mentioning the radiogramcq.com website that had been created after the article had been submitted, but haven't heard anything back yet. I did add a comment to the article mentioning the website so it would at least be there.</p> <p>(<em>Sorry I can't add a link. When posting it says I don't have permissions to publish links on this site.</em>)</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-549136</guid>
				<title>Account Activation Possibilities</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-549136/account-activation-possibilities</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 05:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>KD8RBP</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1396259</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I have been considering a few different possibilities for activating user accounts.</p> <p>One is to give new users access only to a special &quot;Activation CQ List&quot; and their account would be activated once someone on that list receives a radiogram from them and then activates their account. The list would be made up of trusted amateurs that have been given special roles on the site to do this.</p> <p>The other is just to have an administrator approve new accounts (after perhaps checking to make sure basic things like their name and callsign match-up). This would make it easier for people to sign up, but wouldn't be as good at preventing fake accounts.</p> <p>I didn't know if anyone had any other suggestions, or if one of these two seemed the better approach.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-549131</guid>
				<title>New List &quot;General&quot; Added</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-549131/new-list-general-added</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 04:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>KD8RBP</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1396259</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>A new list &quot;General&quot; has been added to RadiogramCQ.com to be a general recipient of radiograms. I thought it would be good to have a generic list for if you just want to receive radiograms in general.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-269498</guid>
				<title>Help choose a new site layout</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-269498/help-choose-a-new-site-layout</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>dhb</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>204011</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>We are going to be changing the NTS Talk web site layout and we would appreciate your ideas and feedback. Use the theme previewer on the home page to see other possible layouts and the let us know what you think here in the forum.</p> <p>Thanks and 73,</p> <p>Dave</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-141663</guid>
				<title>TRAFFIC: A New Mission for NTS?</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-141663/traffic:a-new-mission-for-nts</link>
				<description>Jim Wades, WB8SIW, suggests a new mission for the National Traffic System in the April 2009 issue of World Radio Online</description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>dhb</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>204011</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>In the Traffic column of the April 2009 issue of World Radio Online, Jim Wades, WB8SIW, proposes a new mission for NTS, direct advertising of amateur radio. The article suggests email delivery as a solution to certain delivery problems, and outlines advantages to email delivery for the purposes of direct advertising.</p> <p>NTS has always stressed the public relations aspect of final message delivery. This proposal morphs putting amateur radio's best foot forward to advertising. My impression is that the public sentiment toward email advertising has become just as strong as toward telemarketing. Perhaps the delivery can be presented in a manner which will avoid an association with unsolicited email advertising while providing information or link to information about amateur radio.</p> <p>The main problem with email delivery has been that one cannot guarantee that the recipient has received the message or even that the message was sent to the correct addressee. Spam email filtering likely makes successful delivery even less certain. Ensuring delivery to the addressee is one of the advantages of the NTS. Is this issue the same for postal mail delivery which is an accepted practice? Is there a way to address the problems of email delivery?</p> <p>In my view, NTS needs not so much a new mission as new ways to put the system to work. It won't be one thing but rather many things which catch the imagination of radio amateurs that will bring operators back to the NTS. While direct advertising of amateur radio may not be a motivating purpose for me, maybe it could be for others.</p> <p>World Radio Online is available for download in PDF format. Jim's article appears in download part 3 of the April 2009 issue, available from the <a href="http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/wr_back_issues.html" target="_blank">WRO Back Issues</a> page.</p> <p>73,</p> <p>Dave</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-141407</guid>
				<title>Most Forums Open to Non-members</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-141407/most-forums-open-to-non-members</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>dhb</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>204011</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Most forums categories are open to posting by non-members. We look forward to the participation of all amateur radio operators and others with an interest. Forums which limit posting to certain members are indicated in the category title.</p> <p>73,</p> <p>Dave</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-136832</guid>
				<title>Southern California Net Reactivation</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-136832/southern-california-net-reactivation</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>dhb</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>204011</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The Southern California Net will be returning to action the week of March 9, 2009. The net will meet Tuesdays and Thursdays at 8:30pm pacific time on or near 3.575 mhz serving the southern California sections of Santa Barbara, Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego. The net also has a training mission. All operators welcome.</p> <p>For additional information, check in on the net or check out the <a class="newpage" href="http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/southern-california-net">net web page</a> here on NTS Talk.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-134811</guid>
				<title>LAX ARES to Cover Message Handling</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-134811/lax-ares-to-cover-message-handling</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>dhb</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>204011</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Los Angeles Section ARES has message handling on the agenda for its monthly meeting on March 7th. Check out the <a href="http://www.laxares.org" target="_blank">Lax Section ARES web site</a> for more information.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-113353</guid>
				<title>North American Traffic &amp; Awards Net Returns to the Air Jan. 1, 2009!</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-113353/north-american-traffic-awards-net-returns-to-the-air-jan-1-2</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>dhb</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>204011</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>From the <a href="http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=185967">QRZ Forum</a>:</p> <p>Coming January 1, 2009 (11 p.m. EST)!</p> <p>The North American Traffic and Awards Net is returning to the hambands! Please join us for a rebirth of this classic WAS net! We've got a system of FREE awards for you based around the net's original premise of Worked All States.</p> <p>We will also be handling formal message traffic at the outset of each net and welcome all stations with message traffic to be passed nationwide to join us nightly on 3905&#160;kHz at 0400z. We even have an award to recognize stations for bringing and passing message traffic!</p> <p>For more information: <a href="http://www.northamericantrafficandawards.net">www.northamericantrafficandawards.net</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-104207</guid>
				<title>ARRL NTS SECOND REGION NET EXPANDS TO INCLUDE EASTERN CANADA</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-104207/arrl-nts-second-region-net-expands-to-include-eastern-canada</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>dhb</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>204011</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><em>From The ARRL Letter, Vol. 27, No. 44</em></p> <p>As of November 1, 2008, the Second Region Net (2RN) of the ARRL National<br /> Traffic System (NTS) expanded its reach, providing regular network nodes<br /> for Canadian provinces in Eastern Canada<br /> &lt;<a href="http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/nts-mpg/">http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/nts-mpg/</a>&gt;.</p> <p>In a joint announcement last week, NTS Eastern Area Chair Marcia Forde,<br /> KW1U, and Bill Thompson, W2MTA, NTS Second Region Net (2RN) Manager for<br /> Cycles 2 and 3, invited those Canadian radio amateurs who handle traffic<br /> to participate in Second Region Net operations as the Eastern Canada Net<br /> (ECN) is no longer active. According to Radio Amateurs of Canada (RAC)<br /> &lt;<a href="http://www.rac.ca/">http://www.rac.ca/</a>&gt;, the ECN, a CW Net, handled traffic for Ontario,<br /> Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Price Edward Island and Newfoundland<br /> into the US for transcontinental transmission.</p> <p>&quot;This expansion of 2RN operations is intended to allow Section Nets in<br /> the eastern provinces of Canada to have outlet to Eastern Area Net<br /> operations and to allow inbound traffic to flow to those provinces of<br /> Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes,&quot; Thompson said. &quot;This is much the<br /> same way as the more-western provinces in Canada currently interface<br /> with the NTS RN7 (Seventh Region Net) and TEN (Tenth Region Net) nets.&quot;</p> <p>Canadian operators are invited to participate in the 2RN operations in<br /> addition to those of their provincial NTS Section Nets. The Second<br /> Region Net operates four times daily on the 75 and 80 meter bands (3.925<br /> and 3.576&#160;MHz) in accordance with the NTS Four Cycle timetable using<br /> Cycles 2, 3 and 4.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-100266</guid>
				<title>Soliciting Suggestions</title>
				<link>http://ntstalk.wikidot.com/forum/t-100266/soliciting-suggestions</link>
				<description>I&#039;m actively soliciting suggestions for what NTS Talk should be and what should be here.  Please post your ideas.</description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>dhb</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>204011</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I have my own thoughts about what I'd like NTS Talk to be. But I'm sitting in a vacuum here. Please add your comments and suggestions about what's set up so far and what you think would help in the overall aim of reviving NTS activity.</p> <p>Thanks!</p> <p>Dave</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>